Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Stuhlsatz's avatar

Thanks Brian. I especially appreciate the break down on the statistics related to the destruction of buildings. We're pretty good at accident prevention, but media reports will fixate on the few thousand homes eliminated by natural disasters vs. the hundreds of thousands that are demolished voluntarily.

Since you're last post I've been trying to think of real world examples of 500 year old dwellings that have a high probability of being occupied for another 500 years. I think that many of the "upper middle class" villas in Tuscany and other Mediterranean locations have architecture suited to longevity. The construction type consists of masonry bearing walls, timber floor and roof framing, and tile or slate roofs. Positive features include decent room proportions, high ceilings, and good natural light. A pain to renovate initially, but once you've established modern utilities you can repair them without tearing apart bearing walls.

The construction methods you describe are most consistent with what the Unity Homes branch of Bensonwood has been doing for more than a decade. I'm impressed by their solutions but skeptical of them as a platform that could be replicated successfully. The verdict is still out on the American stick-framing revolution. Our current demolition rate implies that every dwelling built in the 20th century suburban housing boom will be gone by the end of this century--or the middle of the next one.

Expand full comment
Scott Baker's avatar

I wonder what it takes to make a really large building culturally valuable enough to retain for 1000 years. Are the Empire State Building or the Pentagon examples of that? Probably not, but what would be?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts