Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dick Austin's avatar

In the early 90's I got to know Dr. Kao through volleyball - his daughter was a teammate. I was working in Optical Communications at Bell Labs Area 11, but didn't realize he was "THAT C. Kao" ! A great guy in general and here's a little insight into him: A group of us were going to move him from an apartment in mid-Manhattan to a house in NJ, and we were doing a walk-through to size up the work necessary. I saw a large (6') framed scroll hanging on the wall; lovely hand-brushed calligraphy. Dr. Kao asked "Would you like me to translate?". It had been presented to him by the CUHK Dept. of Electronics on his retirement. With a slight grin he said "This is what it SAYS" and marked each character with his finger: "You .. see .. greatness .. in .. the .. smallest .. of .. things". But then with a devilish grin he remarked "But this is what it MEANS" and jabbing with the finger: " YOU .. MAKE .. LOTS .. OF .. TROUBLE .. OVER .. NOTHING !". It being Fathers Day he took us all out to a very nice restaurant for dim sum. In my book, that's a Mensch.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Clark's avatar

I don't believe the way in which you characterize the glass clarity improvement (10^98) is correct and it exaggerates the extent of the improvement that took place. Given that light attenuates exponentially with distance, the calculation you've done is sensitive to the distance used (1 kilometer) rather than being unitless. For instance, if a distance of 500m was used instead, the losses would be 10 dB and 500 dB, respectively and you'd report an improvement of 10^49. The relevant unitless value to report as the improvement is the ratio of these decibel improvements (i.e. both 1000/20 and 500/10 are a 50x improvement). This is the required decrease in defects per unit length of the fiber optic to produce these results.

Of course, a 50x improvement is impressive, but in line with the type of improvements of Moore's law, rather than fiber optics being a novel case of a 10^98 improvement factor.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts