Discussion about this post

User's avatar
upstater's avatar

I am not sure how Poweroutage.us collects it outage data; I would suspect they are harvesting online outage reports from utilities to advise customers. Our local utility, National Grid, has outage maps and rough values for number of customers affected, etc.

Data collected by utilities are very granular, collected at the individual customer level with smart meters and/or distribution feeder level. It certainly has restoration times even for individual customers. For investor owned utilities this is reported to state regulatory commissions and frequently is part of financial incentives or penalties. Coops (like Cobb County) or public systems (eg, individual TVA-served cities) all collect the same data. Even for very large multi-state systems (Duke, Exelon, etc) data is reported to state commissions on an operating company level (ie, pre-merger), most often within states or even regions within a state.

It is very doubtful that utilities would be sharing this detailed information with Poweroutage.us. County-level data I suspect is used for GIS aggregation and collection; it is not uncommon to have counties served by two or more utilities (eg, LA county or cities served with a public entity and suburbs by an IOU).

Major events, left unscreened, radically skew the data, as Brian reported. IEEE has a standardized "beta method" to screen outliers based on the system's daily average of customer minutes. This is an excellent method and has been used for a couple of decades by utilities and state commissions. The weakness is that the "beta method" is not screening for the number of interruptions (regardless of number of customers) or the number of customers affected. For example, thunderstorms can cause many momentary/short duration outages but an insignificant amount of customer duration. Momentaries are important, especially for electronics and appliances.

IEEE does an annual survey which includes perhaps 50% of US distribution systems. It more-or-less has standardized data definitions and is a decent overview. Note data caveats in the slides.

https://cmte.ieee.org/pes-drwg/wp-content/uploads/sites/61/2024-IEEE-Benchmarking-Survey.pdf

Another huge factor that has tremendous impact on reliability is system design. High density, older urban systems typically have an underground NETWORKED distribution grid. A place like NYC, Boston, DC, etc all operate like this and they seldom have outages. Much of Europe's distribution systems are similar. Sunbelt cities like those in Texas or Florida evolved differently and most distribution circuits are on overhead poles and operate radially. Service to residences are usually underground after 1970, but the feeders are often overhead. Further the AGE of the system and the amount of trees further confound reliability assessment. Coaxing out these factors is extremely difficult on a within-system basis and impossible for between-system (or state, county) benchmarking comparisons. These differences are enormous.

Lastly, the impact of transmission outages is a significant factor in distribution reliability. Typically transmission is attributable for 5-20% of distribution outages. Most often these are caused by 30-99kV subtransmission or substation failures. This data is often not collected systematically. Grid outages can cause system blackouts (think August 2003). If half the hype about AI data center demand pans out, I'd expect it to have dire consequences for consumer/residential reliability and costs.

Expand full comment
Dave Friedman's avatar

Hard to see how our AGI dreams, let alone widespread vehicle electrification, will come to fruition without reliable power.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts